Innovation of Mobile Science Laboratories as a Solution to Access to Practical Learning in Schools: A Case Study at an Education Quality Assurance Center in Banten, Indonesia

Aan Subhan Pamungkas, Suyitno Muslim, Khaerudin Khaerudin

Abstract


Inequality of access to laboratory facilities is one of the main challenges in science learning in schools, especially in areas with limited infrastructure. This study aimed to describe and analyze the innovation of the Mobile Science Laboratory implemented by an Education Quality Assurance Center in Banten, Indonesia as an alternative solution in expanding access to practical learning. This study used a qualitative approach with a case study type. Data collection techniques were carried out through interviews with program managers and documentation analysis. The results of the study indicate that the mobile science laboratory program contributes to expanding access to practical work for students in schools that do not have laboratory facilities, increasing student engagement in science learning, and strengthening teachers' pedagogical capacity. The main challenges in implementation include time constraints, school facility conditions, teacher readiness, and logistics. Supporting factors for the success of the program include the institutional commitment of an Education Quality Assurance Center, adaptive program design, and enthusiasm from target schools. This study recommends integrating the program with teacher training, regional policy support, and developing a replication model in other provinces.


Keywords


Mobile Laboratory; Practical Learning; Educational Innovation; Access to Education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945–1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701749305

Beyers, R. N., Blignaut, A. S., & Mophuti, L. (2012). Mobile fablabs: Local and rural innovation in south africa. EdMedia+ Innovate Learning, 112–122.

Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30.

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational research : planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.

Fatmawati, E. (2018). Mengulik Kompleksitas Proses Difusi Inovasi Teknologi. Jurnal Perpustakaan Universitas Airlangga, Vol. 8 No, 75–79.

Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change. Teachers college press.

Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106

Jones, A. L., & Stapleton, M. K. (2017). 1.2 million kids and counting—Mobile science laboratories drive student interest in STEM. PLOS Biology, 15(5), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001692

Khaerunnisah, K., Vitasari, M., & Suryani, D. I. (2022). Analisis Pembelajaran IPA Berbasis Praktikum di SMP Negeri se–Kecamatan Pontang Kabupaten Serang. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 346–352. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.6.2.346-352

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as The Source of Learning and Development. Prentice Hall, Inc., 1984, 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-7223-8.50017-4

Kotsis, K. T. (2024). Significance of Experiments in Inquiry-based Science Teaching. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 5(2), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2024.5.2.815

Lozano, O. R., & Solbes, J. (2021). Promoting Inquiry Based Learning through Entertaining Science Activities. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 7(4), 1117–1135. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.2390

Marshall, J. C., Smart, J. B., & Alston, D. M. (2017). Inquiry-Based Instruction: A Possible Solution to Improving Student Learning of Both Science Concepts and Scientific Practices. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(5), 777–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9718-x

Miles Matthew, B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

Ningtyas, P. K., Widarti, H. R., Parlan, P., Rahayu, S., & Dasna, I. W. (2024). Enhancing Students ’ Abilities and Skills through Science Leaning Integrated STEM : A Systematic Literature Review To cite this article : literature review . International Journal of Education in Mathematics , Science , and Enhancing Students ’ Abilities.

Patel, A., Kalam, F., Appaya, N., Dhanawade, S., Marwaha, A., Hossain, J. O., Penza, A., Obeysekare, E., & Mehta, K. (2024). Science on Wheels: Transforming Education with Agastya’s Mobile Science Labs. 2024 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1109/GHTC62424.2024.10771510

Roden, W. H., Howsmon, R. A., Carter, R. A., Ruffo, M., & Jones, A. L. (2018). Improving Access to Hands-On STEM Education using a Mobile Laboratory. The Journal of STEM Outreach, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15695/jstem/v1i1.16

Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019). Diffusion of innovations. An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research, Third Edition, March, 415–433. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203710753-35

Rosyid, A., & Mubin, F. (2024). Pembelajaran Abad 21: Melihat Lebih Dekat Inovasi Dan Implementasinya Dalam Konteks Pendidikan Indonesia. Tarbawi : Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pendidikan Islam, 7(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.51476/tarbawi.v7i1.586

Salsyabella, R. C., & Sundari, S. A. (2025). Infrastruktur Pendidikan di Daerah Terpencil efektif dan efisien (Sari , 2021). Sarana pendidikan meliputi alat dan fasilitas yang secara sarana pendidikan dapat dimanfaatkan secara efektif dan efisien ( Parid & Alif , 2020 ). Dalam menciptakan pembelaj. 6(1), 715–722.

Sinaga, E. M., & Fauzi, KMS. M. A. (2024). Literature Review: Sasaran Difusi Inovasi Dalam Lingkup Pendidikan Dasar. Jurnal PGSD: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 17(1), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.33369/pgsd.17.1.63-68

Tikly, L., Vogel, E., & Kurvers, C. (2020). Boosting Gender Equality in Science and Technology: A Challenge for TVET Programmes and Careers. In UNESCO-UNEVOC International Centre for Technical and Vocational Education and Training.

Utsman, M., Bahtiar, B., & Yakin, N. (2022). Upaya Meningkatkan Infrastruktur Pembelajaran Dan Lingkungan Untuk Berkelanjutan Praktik Mutu Pendidikan. Jurnal Isema: Islamic Educational Management, 7(2), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.15575/isema.v7i2.18626

Welch, J. K., & Patton, M. Q. (1992). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. The Modern Language Journal, 76(4), 543. https://doi.org/10.2307/330063

Yanto, N. (2023). Kajian Literatur: Pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam ( IPA ) Berbasis Praktikum. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Ipa Iv, 207–213.

Zhang, L., & Ma, Y. (2023). A study of the impact of project-based learning on student learning effects: a meta-analysis study. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(July), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1202728




DOI: https://doi.org/10.53889/ijses.v5i2.700

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 14 times
PDF - 3 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Aan Subhan Pamungkas, Suyitno Muslim, Khaerudin Khaerudin

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 Creative Commons License

International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License