Development of a Contact Process Demonstration Tool n the Production of Sulfuric Acid to Improve Students' Learning Motivation on Chemical Equilibrium Concepts

Ahmad Syakur, Maria Paristiowati, Afrizal Afrizal

Abstract


This study aimed to; (1) develop a teaching aid for the contact process of sulfuric acid production in chemical equilibrium materials; (2) to find out the influence of contact process teaching aids on increasing learning motivation. This study used a mixed-method research design with product development using R&D methods (Research and Development) using ADDIE (Analyze, Design, Development, Implement, Evaluation) model of product implementation and used a quasi-experimental method to test the effectiveness of the product. The contact process props are in the form of four sets of tools consisting of reactor 1 as a place for oxygen production, reactor 2 as a place for SO2 production, a balance shift pipe as a place for SO3 production, and SO3 Absorption as a place where SO3 meets H2O to produce H2SO4. Contact process props provide students with visualizations of shifts in chemical equilibrium affected by pressure and volume. The feasibility test of material and language experts was 88.44% and the media feasibility test of 91.33% showed that contact process teaching aids on chemical equilibrium materials are very feasible as practicum media. The results of the independent t-test stated that there was an influence of the product on learning motivation with a significance value of  0.012. Contact process teaching aids provide learning with macroscopic representations to students, thus making learning about chemical equilibrium material interesting.


Keywords


Teaching Aids; Contact Process; Learning Motivation; Chemical Equilibrium

Full Text:

PDF

References


Basyiroh, U., Mulyani, B., & Ariani, S. R. D. (2022). Analysis of Learning Difficulties in Chemical Equilibrium Materials. Journal of Chemistry Education, 11(1), 51–59.

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6

Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. F. (2009). Multiple representations in chemical education (Vol. 4). Springer.

Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science motivation questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1159–1176. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20442

Han, T., Lee, S., & Kim, H. (2020). The effects of visualization and interaction on science learning through educational technology. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(3), 101–114.

Juwairiah. (2013). Chemical Learning Aids and Media. Visipena Journal, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.46244/visipena.v4i1.85

Lubis, S. N. (2021). The effect of using interactive multimedia in chemistry learning on students’ critical thinking skills. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 163–176.

Mayasri, A., Reza, M., & Nasir, M. (2023). Identification and Remediation of Misconceptions with a Conceptual Change Approach to Chemical Equilibrium Materials. Orbital: Journal of Chemical Education, 7(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.19109/ojpk.v7i2.19810

Mesra, R. (2023). Research & Development in Education. https://doi.org/Https://Doi.Org/10.31219/Osf.Io/D6Wck.

Permana, A., Widiati, U., & Mustaji, A. (2019). The Effect of the Use of Visual and Kinesthetic Learning Media on Students' Learning Interest in Chemical Bonding Materials. Indonesian Journal of Science Education, 7(1), 17–25.

Purwati, E., & Haryani, S. (2019). Analysis of Obstacles to Chemistry Learning in Senior High School. Journal of Science Education Innovation, 5(2), 177–185.

Rahayu, S., Setiawan, A., & Budiasih, E. (2018). The Effect of Multiple Representation-Based Learning on Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Problem-Solving Skills in Chemical Equilibrium. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 13(2), 319–335.

Ramezani, K., Moghaddam, A. Z., & Rahmani, A. (2019). Optimization of reaction conditions for sulfuric acid synthesis process. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 7(1), 102839.

Smith, R. J., & Jones, A. B. (2018). The impact of hands-on activities on student engagement and learning in chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(7), 1162–1168.

Susanti, S., & Widjajanti, E. (2020). Increasing Student Confidence and Learning Outcomes Through the Use of 3D Models on Stoichiometry Materials. Journal of Chemical Education Innovation, 4(2), 79–88.

Talanquer, V. (2017). On Learning Chemistry: A View from Psychology. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(10), 1421–1428.

Yu, J., Chae, J. (2018). he relationships among intrinsic motivation, learning strategies, and academic achievement in science education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(2), 527–537.

Zidny, R. (2015). Submicroscopic Level Overview to Show Students' Understanding of Concepts on Chemical Equations and Stoichiometry Material. Journal of Science Research and Learning, 1(1), 42–59.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.53889/ijses.v5i2.720

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 1 times
PDF - 4 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Ahmad Syakur, Maria Paristiowati, Afrizal Afrizal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 Creative Commons License

International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License