The Effect of STREAM-Based Teaching Materials Using Smart Apps Creator 3 on Students’ Scientific Literacy

Fenny Pebriani, Leny Heliawati, Didit Ardianto

Abstract


This study aimed to develop STREAM-based water teaching using Smart Apps Creator 3 on students’ scientific literacy. The method carried out by Research and Development uses the 4D design (Define, Design, Develop and Disseminate). The research data were collected and analyzed in the form of quantitative descriptive from the students’ pre-test and post-test results. This research used a Google form by distributing a questionnaire given to students with 56 respondents and 11 science teachers who had used STREAM-based water teaching materials using SAC 3. The results of the study, the average percentage of scientific literacy with N-Gain was 76% with a tall category, which means that the application of learning materials based on STREAM using Smart Apps Creator 3 is proven to improve student learning. Conclusion in this study is STREAM-based teaching materials using SAC 3 are statistically proven to improve students’ scientific literacy to water material in online learning during the current pandemic.


Keywords


Scientific Literacy; Online; Smart Apps Creator 3; STREAM

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aberilla, O. D., Salic, M. H., Orbita, R. R., Bagaloyos, J. B., Demayo, C. G., & Torres, M. A. G. (2021). University Students’ Acceptance of Evolution: Basis for STEM-based Instructional Design. International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability, 1(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.53889/ijses.v1i1.3.

Abidin. (2014). Desain Sistem Pembelajaran dalam Konteks Kurikulum 2013. Refika Aditama: Bandung.

Afifah, R. N. (2018). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Siswa (Lks) Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Berbasis Metode Percobaan. Science Activities, 12(2), 2086 – 2096. http://repository.upy.ac.id/227/.

Agustina, T. W., Rustaman, N. Y., Riandi, & Purwianingsih, W. (2019). Membekalkan Kreativitas Mahasiswa Melalui Strategi Pembelajaran Berbasis Stream Menggunakan Konten Bioteknologi Tradisional. Bioed UIN Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, 9(1).

Aprido B. Simamora, Wahono Widodo, & I Gusti Made Sanjaya. (2020). Innovative Learning Model: Improving The Students’ Scientific Literacy Of Junior High School. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 1(3), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v1i3.55.

Arikunto, S. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Penelitian dan Penilaian Program. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Ayuni, D., Marini, T., Fauziddin, M., & Pahrul, Y. (2020). Kesiapan Guru TK Menghadapi Pembelajaran Daring Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 5(1), 414. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v5i1.579.

Aziz Hussin, A. (2018). Education 4.0 Made Simple: Ideas For Teaching. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies,6(3), 92-98. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.3p.92.

Azizah, W. A., Sarwi, S., & Ellianawati, E. (2020). Implementation of Project -Based Learning Model (PjBL) Using STREAM-Based Approach in Elementary Schools. Journal of Primary Education, 9(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpe.v9i3.39950.

Bahri, S. (2018). Pengembangan Kurikulum Berbasis Multikulturalisme di Indonesia (Landasan Filosofis dan Psikologis Pengembangan Kurikulum Berbasis Multikulturalisme). In Jurnal Ilmiah DIDAKTIKA (Vol. 19, Issue 1, pp. 69–88).

Bao, W. (2020). COVID ‐19 and Online Teaching in Higher Education: A Case Study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191.

Dewi Kusumaningsih, Bety Ayu Windi Ariyanto, Haryanti Budi Utami, & Krisna Adi Ismaya. (2019). La PUISIFY the Form of Application-Based Poetry Learning Media SAC.2.0 on Android. AKSIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 3(2), 334–336. https://doi.org/10.21009/aksis.030210.

Dewi, W. A. F. (2020). Dampak COVID-19 terhadap Implementasi Pembelajaran Daring di Sekolah Dasar. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(1), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v2i1.89.

Dhawan, S. (2020). Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018.

El Islami, R. A. Z., Nahadi, N., & Permanasari, A. (2016). Membangun Literasi Sains Siswa Pada Konsep Asam Basa Melalui Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 2(2), 110. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v2i2.662.

English, L. D., & King, D. T. (2015). STEM learning through engineering design : fourth-grade students ’ investigations in aerospace. International Journal of STEM Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0027-7.

Farwati, R., Metafisika, K., Sari, I., Sitinjak, D. S., Solikha, D. F., & Solfarina, S. (2021). STEM Education Implementation in Indonesia: A Scoping Review. International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability, 1(1), 11–32. https://doi.org/10.53889/ijses.v1i1.2.

Fitriyani, Y., Fauzi, I., & Sari, M. Z. (2020). Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa pada Pembelajaran Daring Selama Pandemik Covid-19. Profesi Pendidikan Dasar, 7(1), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.23917/ppd.v7i1.10973.

Fraenkel, J. R. & Helen H. Hyun. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education.

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2018). IBM SPSS Statistics 25 Step by Step. In IBM SPSS Statistics 25 Step by Step. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351033909.

Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores. Unpublished. [Online] URL: http://www. Physics. Indiana. Edu/~ sdi/AnalyzingChange-Gain. Pdf.

H Mubarok, N S Safitri, A. S. A. (2020). The Novelty of Religion and Art : Should We Combine with STEM Education ? Studies in Philosophy of Science and Education, 1(3), 97–103

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). Remote Teaching and Online Learning. Educause Review, 1–15. https://er.Educause.edu/Articles/2020/3/the-Difference-Between-Emergency-Remote-Teaching-and-.

Ithnina, T. S. and M. S. (2013). Science and Technology Leaders for a Sustainable Future. 49–56. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9418.003.0007.

Khasanah, K., Muhlas, M., & Marwani, L. (2020). Development of E-Learning Smart Apps Creator (SAC) Learning Media for Selling Employees on Paid Tv. Akademika, 9(02), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.34005/akademika.v9i02.819.

Kotsopoulos, K. I., Chourdaki, P., Tsolis, D., Antoniadis, R., & Pavlidis, G. (2019). An Authoring Platform for Developing Smart Apps which Elevate Cultural Heritage Experiences : A System Dynamics Approach in Gamification. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01505-w.

Mahase, E. (2020). Covid-19: WHO Declares Pandemic because of “Alarming Levels” of Spread, Severity, and Inaction. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 368(m1036), 1. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1036.

Nasir Mustafa. (2020). Impact of the 2019 – 20 Coronavirus Pandemic on Education. International Journal of Health Preferences Research, 1–36.

Odegaard, M., Haug, B., Mork, S., & Sorvik, G. O. (2015). Budding Science and Literacy. A Classroom Video Study of the Challenges and Support in an Integrated Inquiry and Literacy Teaching Model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 167(1877), 274–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.674.

OECD. (2003). Literacy Skills for The World of To- morrow – Further results from PISA 2000. Chapter 1 : Programme fro International Student Assesment and non-OECD countries. Paris : OECD.

OECD. (2013). PISA 2012. Assessment and analytical framework: mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264190511-en.

OECD&ADB. (2015). Education in Indonesia: Rising to the Challenge. Paris: OECD Publishin

OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Results: What students know and can do – student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Volume I), dx.doi.org.

OECD. (2017). PISA For development assessment and analitical framework: Reading, mathematics and science. www.oecd.org/about/publishing/corrigenda.htm.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Ok, Ü. (2016). The Ok-Religious Attitude Scale (Islam): Introducing an Instrument Originated in Turkish for International Use. Journal of Beliefs and Values, 37(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2016.1141529.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.53889/ijses.v2i1.29

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 858 times
PDF - 626 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Fenny Pebriani, Leny Heliawati, Didit Ardianto

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 Creative Commons License

International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License