Indonesian Students' Scientific Literacy in Islamic Junior High School
Abstract
Scientific literacy is one of the main and key aspects of facing various challenges in the 21st century. Building students' scientific literacy does not mean making every student a future scientist. However, this is more about building their knowledge of science and technology to play a role in making choices that impact the survival of life today and in the future. This study aimed to analyze the scientific literacy skills of Islamic Junior High School students in Indonesia by using PISA questions from the previous year and finding out their perceptions of PISA academic literacy questions. This study used a sequential explanatory research method with a mixed quantitative and qualitative approach. A total of 150 students from eight Islamic Junior High Schools in West Sumatra and DKI Jakarta Provinces in Indonesia were selected using a purposeful sampling technique. The instruments used are scientific literacy tests to collect quantitative data, interview guides, and open questionnaires for qualitative data. The quantitative data obtained were analyzed by descriptive statistics, while the qualitative data were analyzed by thematic analysis. The results show that the science literacy score of Indonesian Students in Islamic Junior High schools value of Islamic Junior High School students is lower than the average value of the OECD countries and the United States. Then, the students also thought that the scientific literacy questions tested were difficult because they rarely got similar questions. This results also suggest that several factors cause the low literacy scores of Islamic junior high school students, namely their lack of habit of working on similar questions, the limited number of teachers in giving questions that promote critical and analytical thinking skills and the low desire of students to read and explore knowledge other than what they get in school.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alivernini, and Manganelli, S (2015) Country School and Students Factors associated with extreme levels of science literacy Across 25 Countries Int. J. Sci. Edu. 37 (12) 1992-2012
Baird, J. A., Isaacs, T., Johnson, S., & Stobart, G. (2011). Policy Effect of PISA. Oxford University Centre for Educational Assessment.
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), pp. 77-101.
Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Bybee, R. W. and Ben-Zvi, N. (1998). “Science curriculum: transforming goals to practice”. In International handbook of science education, Edited by: Fraser, B. J. and Tobin, K. G. 487–498. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Creswell, J.W , Creswell J,D (2018) Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. California: Sage Publications, inc.
DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601.
Dobbins, M., & Martens, K. (2012). Towards an education approach à la finlandaise? French education policy after PISA. Journal of Education Policy, 27(1), 23-43.
Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: the PISA ‘effect’ in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23-37.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The Nature of Science Education for Enhancing Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347-1362.
Hurd, P. D. (1958). Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools. Educational Leadership, 13-16.
Knighton, T., Brochu, P., & Gluszynski, T. (2010). Measuring Up: Canadian Results of the OECD PISA Study The Performance of Canada’s Youth in Reading, Mathematics and Science 2009 First Results for Canadians Aged 15. Ministry of Industry Canada.
Knodel, P., Martens, K., & Niemann, D. (2013). PISA as an ideational roadmap for policy change: exploring Germany and England in a comparative perspective. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 11(3), 421-441
Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84(1), 71-94.
National Centre for Education Statistic (2015). PISA Science Literacy Items and Scoring Guides. Available at https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pisa/pdf/items2_science.pdf
Neumann, K., Fischer, H. E., & Kauertz, A. (2010). From PISA to Educational Standards: The Impact of Large-Scale Assessments on Education in Germany. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 545-563
Ramli, M et al (2021). Assessing islamic junior high schools students' scientific literacy using PISA released items. Journal of Physics Conference Series 1836 012068
Shaffer, J.F, Ferguson, J and Denaro K (2019). Use of the Test of Scientific Literacy Skills Reveals That Fundamental Literacy Is an Important
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53889/ijses.v2i1.33
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 933 timesPDF - 716 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Munasprianto Ramli, Baiq Hana Susanti, Media Putri Yohana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License